2枚組で約6時間の作品です。
アンナの夫で政府高官カレーニンをエリック・ポーター、
アンナと恋に落ちる青年将校ヴロンスキー伯爵をスチュアート・ウィルソンが演じています。
この男優二人とも、ジュレミー・ブレットが演じるグラナダTV版シャーロック・ホームズの冒険シリーズに出演してます。
エリック・ポーターは「最後の事件」のモリアーティ教授、
スチュアート・ウィルソンは「第二の血痕」でヨーロッパ担当相トレロニー・ホープを演じていました。
この「アンナ・カレーニナ」はロシア文学ですが、
BBC製作でホームズシリーズに出演俳優2人が主役陣を務めるため、
どうしてもイギリス作品の感じを満喫しながら視聴しました。
映画もソフィー・マルソーとキーラ・ナイトレイがアンナ役を務める2本を見ました。
比較して、好きな作品はソフィー・マルソー主演・バーナード・ローズ監督のものですが、
ニコラ・パジェット主演のこちらの作品は、芯からリアリティがあり、6時間を費やしているだけに、
会話や場面の運びが丁寧で、息の合った演技とセリフ、演出、衣装、美術と総てに満足します。
最後、自殺してしまうのは、神経が想像以上に不安定になる「産後のうつだからかな・・・」と考えていました。
小説というフィクションですが、社交界から締め出されても、ヴロンスキー伯爵の領地に居を定めたのであれば、
二人の周囲を少しづつ整えていくことをすれば良かったのではないかと、
泉下のトルストイに意見したいと思っています。
愛のために選択した新しい人生をアンナ自身の破滅で終わらせているので、
トルストイは美女に振られたことがあったからではないだろうかと考えさせられました。
不倫から自殺という悲劇には共感できません。
アンナ・カレーニナ [DVD]
仕様 | 価格 | 新品 | 中古品 |
フォーマット | 色, 字幕付き |
コントリビュータ | エリック・ポーター, ニコラ・パジェット, バジル・コールマン |
言語 | 英語 |
稼働時間 | 6 時間 5 分 |
この商品をチェックした人はこんな商品もチェックしています
ページ 1 以下のうち 1 最初から観るページ 1 以下のうち 1
商品の説明
商品紹介
- 本編
- 特典
- 作品解説
- 登場人物紹介
- スタッフ・キャスト紹介
《監督》バジル・コールマン
《原作》レフ・トルストイ
《出演》ニコラ・パジェット、エリック・ポーター、スチュアート・ウィルソン
レビュー
製作総指揮: ケン・リディントン 製作: ドナルド・ウィルソン 監督: バジル・コールマン 原作: レフ・トルストイ 脚本: ドナルド・ウィルソン 出演: ニコラ・パジェット/エリック・ポーター/スチュアート・ウィルソン
-- 内容(「CDジャーナル」データベースより)
登録情報
- アスペクト比 : 1.33:1
- メーカーにより製造中止になりました : いいえ
- 言語 : 英語
- 梱包サイズ : 18.03 x 13.76 x 1.48 cm; 83.16 g
- EAN : 4933672229355
- 監督 : バジル・コールマン
- メディア形式 : 色, 字幕付き
- 時間 : 6 時間 5 分
- 発売日 : 2004/7/25
- 出演 : ニコラ・パジェット, エリック・ポーター
- 販売元 : アイ・ヴィ・シー
- ASIN : B0002B570K
- ディスク枚数 : 2
- Amazon 売れ筋ランキング: - 174,227位DVD (DVDの売れ筋ランキングを見る)
- - 476位イギリスのTVドラマ
- カスタマーレビュー:
-
トップレビュー
上位レビュー、対象国: 日本
レビューのフィルタリング中に問題が発生しました。後でもう一度試してください。
2015年10月15日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
2016年11月9日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
19世紀の、今では見られない貴族の華やかな世界が繰り広げられており、満足しました。
2003年9月11日に日本でレビュー済み
Amazonで購入
テレビドラマのためか、派手なセットやカメラワークや演出を一切排し、BGMもごく稀にしか流さない、正統派の舞台劇に近い感じの地味な作品だが、原作をかなり忠実に再現している。365分という長さなだけに、ほかの映画版より原作の省略が比較的に少ない。原作で描かれる貴族社会の偽善性や、登場人物間の複雑な人間模様、徐々に孤立を深めて現実に押し潰されていくアンナの姿を丹念に描いている。個人的には、罪深いはずの女のアンナを過度に美化したり同情したりせず、むしろ原作者トルストイのように冷徹で現実的な描き方をするところが気に入った。
キャストはさすがにBBCだけあって、全体としてとても堅実な演技をしている。アンナ役のニコラ・パジェットはまさにはまり役だ。愛憎がはっきりしていて、あくまでも強気な姿勢を取りながら、心の中で夫に対する罪悪感と自分の境遇の不安定さに苦しむアンナの姿を、時には繊細な、時には程好いドラマチックな演技で表現し、鮮烈な印象を与える。夫カレーニン役のエリック・ポーターと愛人ウロンスキー役のスチュアート・ウィルソンも原作のイメージにぴったり。
難を言えば、レーヴィンとキティーの微笑ましい純粋な恋の描写がやや物足りなくて、原作におけるアンナの不幸との対比があまり引き立たない。トルストイの分身といわれるレーヴィンの描写、特に農業や狩猟への情熱や、宗教に対する疑念と目覚めが中途半端に終わってしまい、またラストも竜頭蛇尾の感があってちょっと惜しかった。
なお、製作時の70年代にはロシアでの撮影が厳しく規制されていたため、ロケはロシアの雰囲気に近いハンガリーのほうで行われたらしいが、イギリスの作品なのでイギリス色がやや濃くて、ロシアを背景とした原作とは雰囲気がちょっと食い違うきらいがある。
キャストはさすがにBBCだけあって、全体としてとても堅実な演技をしている。アンナ役のニコラ・パジェットはまさにはまり役だ。愛憎がはっきりしていて、あくまでも強気な姿勢を取りながら、心の中で夫に対する罪悪感と自分の境遇の不安定さに苦しむアンナの姿を、時には繊細な、時には程好いドラマチックな演技で表現し、鮮烈な印象を与える。夫カレーニン役のエリック・ポーターと愛人ウロンスキー役のスチュアート・ウィルソンも原作のイメージにぴったり。
難を言えば、レーヴィンとキティーの微笑ましい純粋な恋の描写がやや物足りなくて、原作におけるアンナの不幸との対比があまり引き立たない。トルストイの分身といわれるレーヴィンの描写、特に農業や狩猟への情熱や、宗教に対する疑念と目覚めが中途半端に終わってしまい、またラストも竜頭蛇尾の感があってちょっと惜しかった。
なお、製作時の70年代にはロシアでの撮影が厳しく規制されていたため、ロケはロシアの雰囲気に近いハンガリーのほうで行われたらしいが、イギリスの作品なのでイギリス色がやや濃くて、ロシアを背景とした原作とは雰囲気がちょっと食い違うきらいがある。
他の国からのトップレビュー

Cassandra
5つ星のうち5.0
The Definitive "Anna Karenina"
2017年10月12日にカナダでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
The definitive production of Tolstoy's masterpiece, this was made by the BBC in 1977. The adaptation follows the book very closely, and the actors chosen for the characters are perfectly suited. Nicola Paget is a vulnerable and luminous Anna, and Eric Porter even manages to make the stiff character of Karenin sympathetic. In fact, watching it again after so many years, I find myself taking his side in the debacle that follows Anna's affair with Vronsky! The costumes and settings are gorgeous, and the whole production far better than anything achieved now. A glorious addition to my dvd library.

Jane
5つ星のうち5.0
a role interpreted by many a great actress - Greta Garbo and Vivien Leigh in particular ...
2018年2月4日に英国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
I recall watching this in 1974 when it was first shown by the BBC. The story of Anna Karenina is a haunting one, a role interpreted by many a great actress - Greta Garbo and Vivien Leigh in particular spring to mind. However this adaptation, for me, is the benchmark by which others might be measured. In these days of 'quick fix' TV, that this story is told in ten, fifty minute episodes, gives this adaptation a chance to unfold at a comfortable and measured pace. We can enjoy watching the other threads to the main drama (the love affair between Anna and Vronsky), develop, threads which ultimately offer a happier future for its protagonists, than the one that envelops Anna. To marry for love at that time, is clearly a blessing that is hard to measure. Anna did not, and that is her tragedy.
What makes this so watchable is Nicola Padgett's performance. She is - in our view - quite breathtaking in the role. You watch her gradually mentally disintegrate, as the society in which she lives unleashes, in full, the invidious hypocracy and double standards of the day, condeming her for being open and honest about her emotions and affair, and punishing her by enforcing its rigid social rules. In other words, you can be unfaithful, as long as you are discreet and are prepared to live a double life. Anna cannot. And of course, as was true of that time, women were more openly condemned than men. She loses her son, her position in society, and many of her so called 'friends'. Ultimately, it is her love affair that pays the tragic price as she realises she can never re-establish herself, and her relationship with Vronsky, back into her social milieu. Even though she openly expresses her dislike and discomfort with its rules and expectations, she knows that she - and her children - will always be condemned. She is a lost soul, inceasingly isolated and friendless, her mental disintegration alienating Vronsky who, towards the end, finds it difficult to support and fully understand the woman he loves. Stuart Wilson is also excellent and he and Padgett have a powerful screen chemistry. Eric Porter is terrific as the stifled, narrow, unemotional husband - a mismatched pair if ever there was one! As a viewer, you feel Anna's pain as she takes the only way out that makes sense to her. Gripping TV.
What makes this so watchable is Nicola Padgett's performance. She is - in our view - quite breathtaking in the role. You watch her gradually mentally disintegrate, as the society in which she lives unleashes, in full, the invidious hypocracy and double standards of the day, condeming her for being open and honest about her emotions and affair, and punishing her by enforcing its rigid social rules. In other words, you can be unfaithful, as long as you are discreet and are prepared to live a double life. Anna cannot. And of course, as was true of that time, women were more openly condemned than men. She loses her son, her position in society, and many of her so called 'friends'. Ultimately, it is her love affair that pays the tragic price as she realises she can never re-establish herself, and her relationship with Vronsky, back into her social milieu. Even though she openly expresses her dislike and discomfort with its rules and expectations, she knows that she - and her children - will always be condemned. She is a lost soul, inceasingly isolated and friendless, her mental disintegration alienating Vronsky who, towards the end, finds it difficult to support and fully understand the woman he loves. Stuart Wilson is also excellent and he and Padgett have a powerful screen chemistry. Eric Porter is terrific as the stifled, narrow, unemotional husband - a mismatched pair if ever there was one! As a viewer, you feel Anna's pain as she takes the only way out that makes sense to her. Gripping TV.

MyD -- The Viewpoint
5つ星のうち5.0
TRESPASS AND FORGIVENESS -- COMPARISON OF 6 VERSIONS OF KARENINA --- with links
2014年7月7日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済みAmazonで購入
1977 BBC MINI SERIES IS THE GOLD STANDARD OF ADAPTATIONS even after nearly 40 years (it does show its age in some ways).
Considered one of the great achievements in literary adaptations. Ten episodes allow this production to follow in great detail the events, themes, even much original dialog of Tolstoy's classic. Trespass - Forgiveness - Atonement, as well as the social, gender and class issues are all expertly realized. It's not just the runtime that allows this. Truly, they put great effort into conveying the pivotal moments and contrasting relationships that I think Tolstoy intended. This is BBC in the 70's, so a slightly dryer atmosphere (less music etc...) should be expected and modern audiences might need a moment to adjust to the style. BBC of that time often leaned more toward the stage acting style and moved to more natural in more 80s. The important contrast in relationships and personalities is more defined in this version than any other I have seen. Even today, certain characters are some of my favorite performances of any version despite the older style and less technical glitz. It is astonishing how well this production has aged despite its minor flaws. It is my favorite so far (2014 time of writing) even though several episodes caught me nodding off as it is very long. There are adaptations that excel beyond this in individual areas. But for total virtues, simply nothing has come along that touches it. If you can take the nearly ten hour slog, this adaptation is likely for you.
BRIEF COMPARISONS TO OTHER EDITIONS with links to the product (this list is not comprehensive and I apologize if a favored version is not represented. I already watched nearly 24 hrs of video not counting research and writing!) This list is not in order of precedence and each version has merits. You can see slightly more detailed versions of my reviews like the paragraph above by going to each product page.
2000 Materpiece Theater Masterpiece Classic: Anna Karenina, Part 1 with Helen McCrory and Kevin McKidd
This version is the next longest I viewed and fairly faithful to the plot and spirit of the book. The acting style is more natural (less stage play melodramatic) and the entire focus seems to be on a realistic portrayal. Lead actors less compelling than I would have liked. This version will still be some peoples' favorite. It is not mine.
1948 Anna Karenina with Vivien Leigh and Kieron Moore
Classic black and white is a different style and shouldn't be compared too critically with modern adaptations. It has the charm of a golden age of cinema. Leigh is perhaps still the most elegant Anna and Kieron Moore the most dashing Vronsky after all this time.
1997 Bernard Rose version Leo Tolstoy's Anna Karenina with Sophie Marceau and Sean Bean
Most visually stunning of the traditional adaptations, gorgeous cinematography and recognizable stars galore. Despite all the stars, acting is uneven and accents all over the place. Choppy story flow. Still one of my favorites!
1985 TV Movie Anna Karenina with Jacqueline Bisset and Christopher Reeve
Shortened or edited version is somewhat lifeless though the flow is less choppy than other adaptations. Badly in need of a restoration in video/sound quality and return of the lost footage not found in any copies I know of.
2012 Art film by Joe Wright Anna Karenina with Kiera Knightly
This is not for Tolstoy traditionalists! However, the stunning visuals and choreographed set pieces really are brilliant. It is set like a stage play and tends to swirl around a lot. I hated it the first time because I wanted something else. Understanding it better, I like it more.
Considered one of the great achievements in literary adaptations. Ten episodes allow this production to follow in great detail the events, themes, even much original dialog of Tolstoy's classic. Trespass - Forgiveness - Atonement, as well as the social, gender and class issues are all expertly realized. It's not just the runtime that allows this. Truly, they put great effort into conveying the pivotal moments and contrasting relationships that I think Tolstoy intended. This is BBC in the 70's, so a slightly dryer atmosphere (less music etc...) should be expected and modern audiences might need a moment to adjust to the style. BBC of that time often leaned more toward the stage acting style and moved to more natural in more 80s. The important contrast in relationships and personalities is more defined in this version than any other I have seen. Even today, certain characters are some of my favorite performances of any version despite the older style and less technical glitz. It is astonishing how well this production has aged despite its minor flaws. It is my favorite so far (2014 time of writing) even though several episodes caught me nodding off as it is very long. There are adaptations that excel beyond this in individual areas. But for total virtues, simply nothing has come along that touches it. If you can take the nearly ten hour slog, this adaptation is likely for you.
BRIEF COMPARISONS TO OTHER EDITIONS with links to the product (this list is not comprehensive and I apologize if a favored version is not represented. I already watched nearly 24 hrs of video not counting research and writing!) This list is not in order of precedence and each version has merits. You can see slightly more detailed versions of my reviews like the paragraph above by going to each product page.
2000 Materpiece Theater Masterpiece Classic: Anna Karenina, Part 1 with Helen McCrory and Kevin McKidd
This version is the next longest I viewed and fairly faithful to the plot and spirit of the book. The acting style is more natural (less stage play melodramatic) and the entire focus seems to be on a realistic portrayal. Lead actors less compelling than I would have liked. This version will still be some peoples' favorite. It is not mine.
1948 Anna Karenina with Vivien Leigh and Kieron Moore
Classic black and white is a different style and shouldn't be compared too critically with modern adaptations. It has the charm of a golden age of cinema. Leigh is perhaps still the most elegant Anna and Kieron Moore the most dashing Vronsky after all this time.
1997 Bernard Rose version Leo Tolstoy's Anna Karenina with Sophie Marceau and Sean Bean
Most visually stunning of the traditional adaptations, gorgeous cinematography and recognizable stars galore. Despite all the stars, acting is uneven and accents all over the place. Choppy story flow. Still one of my favorites!
1985 TV Movie Anna Karenina with Jacqueline Bisset and Christopher Reeve
Shortened or edited version is somewhat lifeless though the flow is less choppy than other adaptations. Badly in need of a restoration in video/sound quality and return of the lost footage not found in any copies I know of.
2012 Art film by Joe Wright Anna Karenina with Kiera Knightly
This is not for Tolstoy traditionalists! However, the stunning visuals and choreographed set pieces really are brilliant. It is set like a stage play and tends to swirl around a lot. I hated it the first time because I wanted something else. Understanding it better, I like it more.


MyD -- The Viewpoint
2014年7月7日にアメリカ合衆国でレビュー済み
Considered one of the great achievements in literary adaptations. Ten episodes allow this production to follow in great detail the events, themes, even much original dialog of Tolstoy's classic. Trespass - Forgiveness - Atonement, as well as the social, gender and class issues are all expertly realized. It's not just the runtime that allows this. Truly, they put great effort into conveying the pivotal moments and contrasting relationships that I think Tolstoy intended. This is BBC in the 70's, so a slightly dryer atmosphere (less music etc...) should be expected and modern audiences might need a moment to adjust to the style. BBC of that time often leaned more toward the stage acting style and moved to more natural in more 80s. The important contrast in relationships and personalities is more defined in this version than any other I have seen. Even today, certain characters are some of my favorite performances of any version despite the older style and less technical glitz. It is astonishing how well this production has aged despite its minor flaws. It is my favorite so far (2014 time of writing) even though several episodes caught me nodding off as it is very long. There are adaptations that excel beyond this in individual areas. But for total virtues, simply nothing has come along that touches it. If you can take the nearly ten hour slog, this adaptation is likely for you.
BRIEF COMPARISONS TO OTHER EDITIONS with links to the product (this list is not comprehensive and I apologize if a favored version is not represented. I already watched nearly 24 hrs of video not counting research and writing!) This list is not in order of precedence and each version has merits. You can see slightly more detailed versions of my reviews like the paragraph above by going to each product page.
2000 Materpiece Theater [[ASIN:B0090X4V80 Masterpiece Classic: Anna Karenina, Part 1]] with Helen McCrory and Kevin McKidd
This version is the next longest I viewed and fairly faithful to the plot and spirit of the book. The acting style is more natural (less stage play melodramatic) and the entire focus seems to be on a realistic portrayal. Lead actors less compelling than I would have liked. This version will still be some peoples' favorite. It is not mine.
1948 [[ASIN:B000MGBLHI Anna Karenina]] with Vivien Leigh and Kieron Moore
Classic black and white is a different style and shouldn't be compared too critically with modern adaptations. It has the charm of a golden age of cinema. Leigh is perhaps still the most elegant Anna and Kieron Moore the most dashing Vronsky after all this time.
1997 Bernard Rose version [[ASIN:B004VHOAGS Leo Tolstoy's Anna Karenina]] with Sophie Marceau and Sean Bean
Most visually stunning of the traditional adaptations, gorgeous cinematography and recognizable stars galore. Despite all the stars, acting is uneven and accents all over the place. Choppy story flow. Still one of my favorites!
1985 TV Movie [[ASIN:B008GUWBVW Anna Karenina]] with Jacqueline Bisset and Christopher Reeve
Shortened or edited version is somewhat lifeless though the flow is less choppy than other adaptations. Badly in need of a restoration in video/sound quality and return of the lost footage not found in any copies I know of.
2012 Art film by Joe Wright [[ASIN:B008220C56 Anna Karenina]] with Kiera Knightly
This is not for Tolstoy traditionalists! However, the stunning visuals and choreographed set pieces really are brilliant. It is set like a stage play and tends to swirl around a lot. I hated it the first time because I wanted something else. Understanding it better, I like it more.
このレビューの画像






Isabella
5つ星のうち5.0
Exzellent und detailgetreu
2014年1月11日にドイツでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
Ich habe das Werk von Tolstoi das erstemal mit ca. 14 Jahren gelesen. Natürlich war ich damals zu jung, um es wirklich zu verstehen. Aber die Faszination ist bis heute geblieben. Jede Verfilmung habe ich mit Spannung erwartet und war immer aufs neue enttäuscht. Nur die 10 teilige BBC Verfilmung, die wohl Ende der 70iger das erste Mal über den Bildschirm flimmerte, kann meinen Ansprüchen genügen. Sie ist exzellent und detailgetreu, was natürlich bei einer Serie leichter ist als bei einer 90 minütigen Verfilmung. Nicola Pagett ist die ideale Besetzung der Anna Karenina. Nicht nur ihr Äußeres trifft die Figur, auch ihr differenziertes Spiel ist fesselnd und lässt einen mit Anna lieben und leiden. Eric Porter spielt nicht nur Karenin, er ist es. Auch alle anderen Rollen sind hervorragend besetzt. Ich war seit langer Zeit auf der Suche nach dieser Serie und bin hocherfreut, dass sie endlich bei Amazon angeboten wird.
Die Lieferung war, wie üblich, schnell und problemlos, auch bei einem UK Import.
Die Lieferung war, wie üblich, schnell und problemlos, auch bei einem UK Import.

Elena Kuleshova
5つ星のうち4.0
è per amanti del musical.
2013年12月16日にイタリアでレビュー済みAmazonで購入
PEr amanti dei musical è un pezzo da avere nella collezione. Musical prodotto in russia, cantato in russo pero, altamente professionale, uno dei capolavori prodotti.