Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer—no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera, scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
Audible sample Sample
Bad Therapy: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up Hardcover – 2 July 2024
In virtually every way that can be measured, Gen Z's mental health is worse than that of previous generations. Youth suicide rates are climbing, antidepressant prescriptions for children are common, and the proliferation of mental health diagnoses has not helped the staggering number of kids who are lonely, lost, sad and fearful of growing up. What's gone wrong?
In Bad Therapy, bestselling investigative journalist Abigail Shrier argues that the problem isn't the kids - it's the mental health experts. Drawing on hundreds of interviews with child psychologists, parents, teachers and young people themselves, Shrier explores the ways the mental health industry has transformed the way we teach, treat, discipline and even talk to our kids. She reveals that most of the therapeutic approaches have serious side effects and few proven benefits: for instance, talk therapy can induce rumination, trapping children in cycles of anxiety and depression; while 'gentle parenting' can encourage emotional turbulence - even violence - in children as they lash out, desperate for an adult to be in charge.
Mental health care can be lifesaving when properly applied to children with severe needs, but for the typical child, the cure can be worse than the disease. Bad Therapy is a must-read for anyone questioning why our efforts to support our kids have backfired - and what it will take for parents to lead a turnaround.
- Print length320 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherSwift Press
- Publication date2 July 2024
- Dimensions24.2 x 16.3 x 3 cm
- ISBN-101800754132
- ISBN-13978-1800754133
Frequently bought together
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
- Therapy can hijack our normal processes of resilience, interrupting our psyche’s ability to heal itself, in its own way, at its own time.Highlighted by 635 Kindle readers
- Adults should be telling kids how imperfect and unreliable their emotions can be, Chentsova Dutton says. Very often, kids should be skeptical that their feelings reflect an accurate picture of the world and even ignore their feelings entirely. (Gasp!) You read that right: a healthy emotional life involves a certain amount of daily repression.Highlighted by 624 Kindle readers
- Instead, with unprecedented help from mental health experts, we have raised the loneliest, most anxious, depressed, pessimistic, helpless, and fearful generation on record. Why?Highlighted by 505 Kindle readers
Product description
Review
'Shrier's trenchant critiques of trauma-focused therapy, social-emotional learning curricula, and other well-intentioned practices are essential reading for parents, teachers, and mental health professionals' - Richard J. McNally, professor of psychology at Harvard University
' -
'
'Shrier persuasively and forcefully demonstrates how mental health professionals (and some parents) often make things worse for the kids and adolescents they aim to help. With splendid writing and thought-provoking analysis, she offers a compelling vision for how to make things better' - Elizabeth Loftus, distinguished professor of psychological science at University of California, Irvine and former president of the Association for Psychological Science
' -
'
'A dazzling combination of investigative reporting and storytelling. A groundbreaking book' - Gerald Posner, award-winning investigative journalist and author of Pharma
' -
'
'A well-researched and engaging exploration of therapy's limitations and potential harms, and a powerful critique of a culture in which 'traumatic' describes anything from horrific abuse to your new laptop going on the blink' - Elizabeth Gaufberg, MD, associate professor of medicine and psychiatry at Harvard Medical School
' -
'
'Abigail Shrier is the smartest and most courageous reporter in the country. There's a high cost to telling the truth, but for parents and kids, the rewards are beyond measure. Five stars' - Caitlin Flanagan, staff writer at The Atlantic
' -
'' -
About the Author
Abigail Shrier is a writer for the Wall Street Journal. She holds an A.B. from Columbia College, where she received the Euretta J. Kellett Fellowship; a BPhil. from the University of Oxford; and a J.D. from Yale Law School.
Product details
- Publisher : Swift Press (2 July 2024)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 320 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1800754132
- ISBN-13 : 978-1800754133
- Dimensions : 24.2 x 16.3 x 3 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 37,932 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 89 in Mood Disorders (Books)
- 156 in Babysitting, Day Care & Child Care
- 1,138 in Parenting (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Abigail Shrier is the New York Times bestselling author of BAD THERAPY: Why the Kids Aren't Growing Up (2024). She received the Barbara Olson Award for Excellence and Independence in Journalism in 2021. Her previous bestseller, IRREVERSIBLE DAMAGE: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters (2020), was named a ‘Best Book’ by The Economist and The Times (of London). It has been translated into ten languages.
Shrier holds an A.B. from Columbia College, where she received the Euretta J. Kellett Fellowship; a B.Phil. from the University of Oxford; and a J.D. from Yale Law School.
Customer reviews
Reviews with images
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from Australia
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
“An embarrassing number of psychological interventions have little proven efficacy. They have nonetheless been applied with great élan to children and adolescents.”
Two definitions are required to comprehend the thesis of her book. Shrier defines bad therapy as anything “that introduces new symptoms, or makes existing symptoms worse”… Additionally, iatrogenesis occurs when patients suffer adverse outcomes or harmful complications because of their doctor/healer/therapist. For example, a nervous or sad child is drawn into a hasty and inaccurate diagnosis. The child is encouraged to ruminate on emotions, which are interpreted as symptoms by the adults around them (some of whom have conflicts of interest). Then the child is labelled with a mental health condition, such as anxiety or depression, medicalised, and suffers adverse side effects.
Here are some examples of iatrogenic effects:
“Police officers who responded to a plane crash and then underwent debriefing sessions exhibited more disaster-related hyperarousal symptoms eighteen months later than those who did not receive the treatment. Burn victims exhibited more anxiety after therapy than those left untreated. Breast cancer patients have left peer support groups feeling worse about their condition than those who opted out. And counseling sessions for normal bereavement often make it harder, not easier, for mourners to recover from loss.”
“Actually, it’s worse than that: it’s in therapists’ interest to treat the least sick for the longest period of time. Ask any therapist what it’s like to treat a bipolar or schizophrenic patient. Answer: extraordinarily difficult. (Many refuse to treat such patients for this reason.) But sit with a teenager once a week who has social anxiety? The family pays on time, the teen’s problems are small, nobody’s getting violent during your session. It’s little wonder why, having acquired such a patient, a therapist may be reluctant to surrender her.”
Shrier ponders the paradox of an exponential rise of mental illness, during several decades of massive expansion of therapeutic treatment:
“More widely available treatment ought to abate the rate (and severity) of disease… And yet as treatments for anxiety and depression have become more sophisticated and more readily available, adolescent anxiety and depression have ballooned.”
Her observations on empathy are nuanced and insightful:
“The most selfless acts a mammal commits she does on behalf of her children. The most violent, in their defense. Where empathy rules human interactions, we see a remarkable nurturing of insiders alongside cruelty and indifference to interlopers.”
Her concluding chapter includes this summary of the book’s thesis:
“Stop allowing interlopers to insert themselves between you and your kids. Adolescents who are suffering with anxiety and depression are obviously not being helped by the current and pervasive mental health treatments. Healthy adolescence can be mercurial and maddening; we know this because we lived it. Today, normal teens are being made ill by the unnecessary treatments our mental health experts dispense indiscriminately. Perhaps most insidiously, the experts insist on habituating our kids into a never-ending confrontation with the one question no therapist can resist: And how did that make you feel? When looped in a young mind, it’s a question that increases dysregulation, inhibits growth, turns teens into toddlers and young adults into the never-quite-ready.”
I was strongly persuaded by Shrier’s overall thesis, and found her range of evidence/argument to be compelling. It has given pause for thought in the conversations/interactions with my own children (less rumination on feelings, more action). After reading the book I’m less likely to take them down a path with therapists/medication.
Shrier’s book offers persuasive takedowns of Social Emotional Learning in schools, trauma-informed care, and Gentle Parenting. I found Bad Therapy to be highly persuasive and insightful, while being slightly less compelling and not quite as well written as Irreversible Damage. I would certainly recommend this book to all parents, teachers and school administrators, as well as people who strive to provide value-adding services for children.
Check out these excellent videos at YouTube:
- How Bad Therapy Can Harm a Generation (Mark Manson podcast with Abigail Shrier)
- Debating Therapy Culture & Gen Z - Abigail Shrier, on Chris Williamson’s Modern Wisdom podcast
Comment from @OUpsychChick: “I have been fully immersed in this therapeutic nightmare with my two very hyperactive boys. One boy was kicked out of a preschool, and I was told to get him play therapy. We tried it, and we also tried a few of the therapeutic like parents coaching intensives. Some of these ideas work, some don't, and most make parenting feel exhausting. We stopped all this. Removed every screen in our home that was accessible to them, told them to go outside, setup rules and boundaries we enforce for proper behavior at, for example, the dinner table. Sometimes, they are still energetic and crazy, but our lives are all much less stressful. The meltdowns are now infrequent, they can sit quietly at the dinner table to eat. They play with toys. After reading Abigail's book, I had my older boy (the one who was kicked out of pre-school) order from the meat counter and check out. We are planning to have him get some groceries this summer when we have a planned vacation. Expectations, no screens, and time outdoors playing mostly unsupervised in our yard has been a God send for our sanity.”
Comment from @wumbomaster1395: “I’m a social worker who works with children and adolescents and the most common thing that I see that is causing issues is fatherlessness. 90%+ of the kids that I see (if I were to guess) don’t have a father, or their father is abusive. They are labeled with oppositional defiant disorder and/or ADHD when in reality, they are not given the care, patience, attention, etc. that they need from a father. ODD is a dumb diagnosis, in my opinion, because it labels the kid as ‘bad kid’ when the truth is that they are a stressed/scared/attention-starved kid. I’ve never met a kid labeled with ODD that had a solid parental foundation.”
According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, iatrogenesis is the “the unintentional causation of an unfavorable health condition (such as disease, injury, infection, or an adverse drug reaction) during the process of providing medical care (such as surgery, drug treatment, hospitalization, or diagnostic testing)”.
Reviewed in Australia on 4 May 2024
“An embarrassing number of psychological interventions have little proven efficacy. They have nonetheless been applied with great élan to children and adolescents.”
Two definitions are required to comprehend the thesis of her book. Shrier defines bad therapy as anything “that introduces new symptoms, or makes existing symptoms worse”… Additionally, iatrogenesis occurs when patients suffer adverse outcomes or harmful complications because of their doctor/healer/therapist. For example, a nervous or sad child is drawn into a hasty and inaccurate diagnosis. The child is encouraged to ruminate on emotions, which are interpreted as symptoms by the adults around them (some of whom have conflicts of interest). Then the child is labelled with a mental health condition, such as anxiety or depression, medicalised, and suffers adverse side effects.
Here are some examples of iatrogenic effects:
“Police officers who responded to a plane crash and then underwent debriefing sessions exhibited more disaster-related hyperarousal symptoms eighteen months later than those who did not receive the treatment. Burn victims exhibited more anxiety after therapy than those left untreated. Breast cancer patients have left peer support groups feeling worse about their condition than those who opted out. And counseling sessions for normal bereavement often make it harder, not easier, for mourners to recover from loss.”
“Actually, it’s worse than that: it’s in therapists’ interest to treat the least sick for the longest period of time. Ask any therapist what it’s like to treat a bipolar or schizophrenic patient. Answer: extraordinarily difficult. (Many refuse to treat such patients for this reason.) But sit with a teenager once a week who has social anxiety? The family pays on time, the teen’s problems are small, nobody’s getting violent during your session. It’s little wonder why, having acquired such a patient, a therapist may be reluctant to surrender her.”
Shrier ponders the paradox of an exponential rise of mental illness, during several decades of massive expansion of therapeutic treatment:
“More widely available treatment ought to abate the rate (and severity) of disease… And yet as treatments for anxiety and depression have become more sophisticated and more readily available, adolescent anxiety and depression have ballooned.”
Her observations on empathy are nuanced and insightful:
“The most selfless acts a mammal commits she does on behalf of her children. The most violent, in their defense. Where empathy rules human interactions, we see a remarkable nurturing of insiders alongside cruelty and indifference to interlopers.”
Her concluding chapter includes this summary of the book’s thesis:
“Stop allowing interlopers to insert themselves between you and your kids. Adolescents who are suffering with anxiety and depression are obviously not being helped by the current and pervasive mental health treatments. Healthy adolescence can be mercurial and maddening; we know this because we lived it. Today, normal teens are being made ill by the unnecessary treatments our mental health experts dispense indiscriminately. Perhaps most insidiously, the experts insist on habituating our kids into a never-ending confrontation with the one question no therapist can resist: And how did that make you feel? When looped in a young mind, it’s a question that increases dysregulation, inhibits growth, turns teens into toddlers and young adults into the never-quite-ready.”
I was strongly persuaded by Shrier’s overall thesis, and found her range of evidence/argument to be compelling. It has given pause for thought in the conversations/interactions with my own children (less rumination on feelings, more action). After reading the book I’m less likely to take them down a path with therapists/medication.
Shrier’s book offers persuasive takedowns of Social Emotional Learning in schools, trauma-informed care, and Gentle Parenting. I found Bad Therapy to be highly persuasive and insightful, while being slightly less compelling and not quite as well written as Irreversible Damage. I would certainly recommend this book to all parents, teachers and school administrators, as well as people who strive to provide value-adding services for children.
Check out these excellent videos at YouTube:
- How Bad Therapy Can Harm a Generation (Mark Manson podcast with Abigail Shrier)
- Debating Therapy Culture & Gen Z - Abigail Shrier, on Chris Williamson’s Modern Wisdom podcast
Comment from @OUpsychChick: “I have been fully immersed in this therapeutic nightmare with my two very hyperactive boys. One boy was kicked out of a preschool, and I was told to get him play therapy. We tried it, and we also tried a few of the therapeutic like parents coaching intensives. Some of these ideas work, some don't, and most make parenting feel exhausting. We stopped all this. Removed every screen in our home that was accessible to them, told them to go outside, setup rules and boundaries we enforce for proper behavior at, for example, the dinner table. Sometimes, they are still energetic and crazy, but our lives are all much less stressful. The meltdowns are now infrequent, they can sit quietly at the dinner table to eat. They play with toys. After reading Abigail's book, I had my older boy (the one who was kicked out of pre-school) order from the meat counter and check out. We are planning to have him get some groceries this summer when we have a planned vacation. Expectations, no screens, and time outdoors playing mostly unsupervised in our yard has been a God send for our sanity.”
Comment from @wumbomaster1395: “I’m a social worker who works with children and adolescents and the most common thing that I see that is causing issues is fatherlessness. 90%+ of the kids that I see (if I were to guess) don’t have a father, or their father is abusive. They are labeled with oppositional defiant disorder and/or ADHD when in reality, they are not given the care, patience, attention, etc. that they need from a father. ODD is a dumb diagnosis, in my opinion, because it labels the kid as ‘bad kid’ when the truth is that they are a stressed/scared/attention-starved kid. I’ve never met a kid labeled with ODD that had a solid parental foundation.”
According to Merriam-Webster dictionary, iatrogenesis is the “the unintentional causation of an unfavorable health condition (such as disease, injury, infection, or an adverse drug reaction) during the process of providing medical care (such as surgery, drug treatment, hospitalization, or diagnostic testing)”.
For the first few chapters I was alternating between “yeah, kinda” to “nah, that’s not really true, but I see how you got there”, but then her true intent became clear when she Implied a direct causal link between “left leaning liberal politics” and mental illness. The lack of self awareness and/or shame to do that straight after deriding links between grief and adverse mental heath responses is breathtaking. She went on to mock those that take a harm minimisation approach to social media likening it to a drug counsellor telling teens how to take ecstasy safely - but that is exactly what we do, because harm minimisation is supported by the evidence. Instead she trots out the false belief that harm minimisation equates to endorsement. Then there are the outright lies. Claiming that psychologists and therapists remained silent regarding the impact on children’s mental health during lockdown is just a lie.
Quite brilliantly she presents it all as well researched by throwing around a few vaguely scientific terms and either referring to statistics from some questionable literature, or just totally misrepresenting others.
It is such a shame as a moderated version of much of this, that didn’t so maliciously pander to the already fearful would be welcome. What really smells though is Shrier decrying anxiety as being socialised, while at the same time actively stoking that same anxiety in her (and my) Gen X cohort - the only difference is that we are meant to present our fears as knowing wisdom while laughing at the kids as being easily led and naive.
Surely that she was pimping this on Joe Rogan should be enough to be sounding alarms in people’s critical thinking.
Top reviews from other countries
For years I have responsibly used psychotropic medication experiencing its benefits, limitations, and negative side effects. Current thinking is talk therapy used with meds, when indicated, can produce the most favorable patient outcomes. I concur. In fact, from 2010-13, at night I earned a MS in mental health counseling even though I am a financial advisor. With that thumbnail sketch, below is brief independent feedback I have received on two of the author’s topics. But first, my overall appraisal:
I find Abigail’s book to be vital in highlighting issues that need to be considered and not merely assumed to be true/wise: therapy, medication, schooling, and parenting - and how they are intertwined. I am delighted that she is so well-known and talented as a journalist to focus attention on the most fundamental question: whether what we are doing is working or failing. It can benefit our nation if we have a discussion and accurate appraisal of where we are to fix what doesn’t work. Abigail bravely has gotten this debate started though I would be unsurprised if vested interests attack her, and continue sos. Unlike the false claims of her critics, she understands that there are circumstances when therapy and meds are appropriate.
My view is that though well-intended, we have lost our way as a society in the areas she has underscored. I give our culture A++++ for our good intentions; however, outcomes must be evaluated candidly. Are we taking steps believing those actions are helpful when they are not? My view, we repeatedly utilize "Ready, fire, aim” to our detriment. Well-meaning adults have abdicated control thinking they are helping when they are harming. Here’s an example:
In my career I meet people from an array of occupations who share personal info. The uniformity of opinion I receive from educators about what is occurring from primary to the university levels is bleak. The educators feel miserable and can’t wait to flee. Why? The bottom line is there’s no discipline permitted. They feel defeated that they can’t teach and will receive zero institutional support because everyone is afraid for their jobs and public/internet ridicule. To paraphrase teachers, the system has collapsed but since there’s a sign on the door “school," learning is presumed to be occurring when it is not. Note how many teachers choose to send their children to private school as an alternative. Look too at the explosive growth of homeschooling as a measure of concern for physical safety and efficacy. One educator told me the kids know the teachers can’t do anything disciplinary to them and behave accordingly.
US academic performance has declined. US results versus nearly 30 other nations is appalling, though we spent so much more per child than competitor nations - and we are in competition whether we ignore that or not. The new bait and switch is to use SEL and pronounce schools as successful by downshifting academic measures replaced with SEL-focused yardsticks. The silver lining in the deadly COVID cloud is some parents got a glimpse of what their kids are being immersed in, were shocked and "voted with their feet" taking their children to be educated elsewhere.
Look at the nightmare on college campuses over the past decade: skyrocketing anxiety, depression and suicides. Those results reflect Abigail’s concerns. The Anxious Generation, by J. Haidt, which I have begun, buttresses Shrier’s thesis.
Overwhelmingly, employers tell me their younger workers behave completely differently, some don’t care about their performance, and except for excellent tech skills, they are surprisingly incapable, needy, demanding, and stunted. Please note: I am fortunate to know young people who do not fit the negative descriptions at school or work reported to me and are the polar opposite.
Our sacred oxen have strayed from path and are at risk - and so is our society.
At times I found her sarcasm humorous and at other times too snarky, but beyond that quibble, she has done a valuable service for our nation if we pause, consider, and act: what do we need to do differently to be more effective?
——————
April 29th Addendum
Finished reading Jonathan Haidt’s thoughtful, research-based, and prescriptive The Anxious Generation. It is excellent also. I rate it as Five Stars and have bought a second copy to gift. It serves as a helpful companion to Schrier’s work. I highly recommend it.
I read his outstanding work, co-authored with Greg Lukianoff, The Coddling of The American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation For Failure, which is also a straightforward, easy read.
Years ago I read, then reread his masterful and superb The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided By Politics And Religion. I found this work to be more challenging, and a fascinating hypothesis.
Lastly, some of the one and two star reviews of Abigail’s book contained insightful, valid criticisms for which I am grateful. Still, I see the value in her work, despite its weaknesses, as having galvanized a needed review of current assumption and practices. Michael
Shrier starts and ends with the role parents have played in creating the conditions and culture in which we now find our youth being raised as well as the role parents can play in taking back responsibility for raising their children in line with their own values.
Parents, whether well intended seeking “better” relationships with their kids than they had with their own parents, want their kids to be happy. A child’s comfort becomes primary. We don’t want them to hurt, suffer, or be unhappy. Parents tend to be older when they’re having kids and they’re having fewer kids. Results of these trends are that parents have more time and resource to allocate to their children and are hyper-invested in their development. Helicopter and lawnmower parenting flows from this. Monitoring of children is more. Comparisons are constant in terms of physical and psychological growth. Every moment of a kid’s day is scheduled. Their freedom curtailed.
Unfortunately, kids aren’t doing well. Today’s youth seem to suffer from several mental ailments that were foreign to past generations. Loneliness, anxiety, and depression are pervasive affecting large swaths of children in Western countries. The kids seem to be maturing slower and are less capable psychologically as well as being pessimistic about their own futures.
Many parents view children as equals and invite them in decision making. The line between parental authority and child is not just blurred but broken. This has allowed many “experts” to enter asserting influence and control over the parent-child relationship.
Mental health concerns and needs are now constantly part of the conversation. The helping professions are heaping advice out left and right. Therapy is available for parents and very young kids. The number of counsellors at schools have grown. Teachers are being “trained” in mental health interventions. Shrier cites a statistic suggesting 40% of today’s youth has received some kind of mental health treatment and a separate statistic noting that 1 in 6 of US kids between the ages of two and eight has been diagnosed with some kind of psychological issue.
Shrier writes of the iatrogenic effects of the burgeoning mental health movement. We’re spending more and more on “mental health,” yet the outcomes noted in the youth population show as worse. For whatever help these interventions may offer, the risk of harm is also present. Moreover, for all the mental health interventions that are now on offer very little evidence is available which demonstrates their effectiveness. We’re pushing things all over the place with little knowledge of whether doing these works. We should step back or slow down. Caution should be our guide, not commitment to unproven processes. Shrier writes, “wanting to help is just not the same as helping.”
Schrier quotes an observation from Christopher Lasch that therapy ‘simultaneously pronounces the patient unfit to manage his own life and delivers him into the hands of a specialist.’ This becomes a principal point of Bad Therapy. Parents have abandoned responsibility for raising their children to an army of self-proclaimed experts. Not only are the interventions not working, they’re contributing to making things worse.
Interventions:
Therapy. Kids aren’t signing up. They’re being signed up. Kids don’t have the ability to stand up and pushback against assertions made by therapists. There’s a power imbalance in the relationship. Simply being sent to therapy suggests to a child there’s something wrong with them.
Focus on Feelings (from SEL – Social Emotional Learning, therapy, counselling, etc.). Feelings as facts. Feelings as foremost. This encouragement to focus on how we feel fosters negative emotion and leads to self-interested people. Two orientations: action versus state. An action orientation is one around what you can do. What’s the task at hand, what should my next step be? What’s in my control? A state orientation is about how you’re feeling. What physical sensations are you experiencing. Action orientations serve and state orientations stifle. Get over yourself and get going. Rumination is a symptom of depression. Good therapists teach people to run from ruminating whereas questions directing people’s attention to negative feelings fosters it.
In an interview with Dr. Jordan Peterson, Schrier writes, “’Self-consciousness,’ or what Peterson calls ‘self-reflection on the feeling state,’ and neurotic suffering are virtually indistinguishable, clinically and psychometrically. ‘In sofar as you’re thinking about yourself, you’re depressed and anxious,’ Peterson said. ‘There’s no difference between thinking about yourself and being depressed and anxious. They are the same thing.’”
Focusing on self breeds narcissists. We think the world and everyone around us exists to make us happy. If we’re not happy, we’re not the problem, outside forces are. We’re encouraged to complain about others. They must stop talking or behaving certain ways that make us uncomfortable. It breeds self-interested complainers that want to control others.
Emphasizing empathy. If we allocate our “caring” for some, we create hostility to others. There becomes both a victim and a perpetrator. We rush to “help” because we “care.” But we do so blinded to the damage we can create of unintended consequences imposed on others. Shrier writes, “Where empathy rules human interactions, we see a remarkable nurturing of insiders alongside cruelty and indifference to interlopers.”
Affirming. Everyone and everything must be not just tolerated but affirmed. Affirming amplifies. It amplifies negative emotion. It amplifies narcissm. It affords a label and offers an excuse. Our struggles become our strength. We get the virtue of victimhood. I must be affirmed becomes I must be accommodated and assisted. It takes problems and makes them worse. Instead of affirming, we should be helping kids face adversity. Don’t shelter, embrace struggle. Realize that I fail you when I make things easy for you.
Monitoring. All aspects of a child’s life are now monitored from birth. Baby monitors, recess monitors, lunch room monitors, bus monitors, hall monitors, and more. Just like with adults when under scrutiny, we don’t feel better, we feel more anxiety. Play dates are planned. No spontaneous roaming around the neighborhood occurs. Kids develop no initiative. They sit around waiting to be told what to do. Exploration, creativity, and curiosity are crushed in favor of planned activities.
Diagnose (then medicate). Drugs as solutions to psychological issues. If they worked, we would see greater prescriptions related to lower incidences. However, we aren’t. Drugs, at best, mask symptoms while curing nothing. At worse, drugs have an impact on developing brains. Drugs should be a last resort and not a first.
Restorative Justice. Reduced punishment. Lower standards. More misbehavior, not less. Decreasing disciplinary efforts leads to worse behavior, not better.
Surveys. “Surveys betray an ontology—a view of the world and what objects furnish it. And in the world of these surveys, trauma is rampant—if not universal.”
The idea of all life dissatisfaction stems from some sort of childhood “trauma” is an awful one. It puts kids against their parents. It removes responsibility for improving things from people and places blame on the past. It gives people a focus to look for blame instead of owning responsibility. Shrier writes, “Trauma hangs over our heads like a low ceiling.” It becomes an excuse to not try and for why we aren’t where we want to be. Shrier writes, “It’s natural to want an explanation. If your life is not as you wish it were, it isn’t your fault. Something done to you in your past made you that way.” That’s an appealing message to many. Phew, what a relief. I knew there was a problem and it’s not me. Ha, now I can sit here smugly and rant and rave in my victimhood.
Schools are intervening in the parent child relationship in deeper and deeper ways with counsellors, psychologists, teachers, and more. They do so secretly. They prompt kids to talk about feelings. They offer surveys with questions that guide focus to certain topics. They do these things without telling parents or sharing the information with them. They are weakening children with these efforts. Again, accommodations are advocated on behalf of children from staff (as well as parents). Bobby has x problem and needs y help. More time to take tests, lower grading standards, a higher mark, oral exam instead of written, etc.
With parents and “helping” professions all “caring” so deeply about the comfort and mental health of kids, we’ve coddled and micro-managed them into mental health misery. Shrier writes, “Shouldn’t flowers bloom in powdered sugar? Turns out, they grow best in dirt.” We are failing our children by our incessant efforts to “help.” See your role as set the stage and get out of the way. Let them have their play. Have faith that they will figure things out given the chance.
Take back responsibility for raising your children. Others don’t know best. You know best. Seek to raise capable adults that will add value to society and not foster friendships with your children. Schrier suggests, “Proceed by subtraction. Clean the dirt out of the cut and the body heals itself. Until you’ve subtracted environmental contaminants that may be hampering your kids—expert, tech, monitoring, meddling, medicinal, or otherwise—you may not know how happy she is or could be.”
Finally, Shrier reminds us, “Having kids is the best, most worthy thing you could possibly do. Raise them well. You’re the only one who can.”